Article in the New Yorker from Malcolm Gladwell of Blink and Tipping Point fame.
Interesting article but Mr Gladwell should not give the underprivileged false hope. He makes a fatal flow called “survivorship bias”.
Simply put. Assume:
P(A) = Brooklyn dudes who succeeded / Brooklyn dudes who tried
P(B) = Princeton dudes who succeeded / Princeton dudes who tried
Well should be obvious that P(B) > P(A). Therefore, no “uses of adversity”
Sidney Weinberg’s story makes for a great read especially since: 1) he is ex-GS (or rather the very epitome of GS in his heydays) and 2) in such tumultuous time when Investment Banks have broken away from their traditional r/s banking model to become pseudo hedge funds. But Mr Gladwell’s article seems more sensationalist than anything, having failed to dealt with the other Brooklyn dudes who tried and failed, i.e. 1 – P(A). What about those fellows? Where lies the advantage of adversity for them?
———-
Annals of Business
The Uses of Adversity
Can underprivileged outsiders have an advantage?
by Malcolm Gladwell November 10, 2008
Sidney Weinberg was born in 1891, one of eleven children of Pincus Weinberg, a struggling Polish-born liquor wholesaler and bootlegger in Brooklyn. Sidney was short, a “Kewpie doll,” as the New Yorker writer E. J. Kahn, Jr., described him, “in constant danger of being swallowed whole by executive-size chairs.” He pronounced his name “Wine-boig.” He left school at fifteen. He had scars on his back from knife fights in his preteen days, when he sold evening newspapers at the Hamilton Avenue terminus of the Manhattan-Brooklyn ferry.
continue below…